Anyone who studies the evidence intelligently, who is capable of an open mind, will soon realize that the original media narrative is nonsense. They will realize that the notion that Zimmerman went and malevolently (or haphazardly) initiated (or provoked) a physical altercation with Trayvon is just not supported by the evidence. Based on the evidence to date, the following is what actually happened:
Zimmerman dialed a non-emergency number for the Sanford Police Department to report a suspicious person he didn’t recognize. The reasons for his suspicions included that he did not recognize this person; it was raining, dark, and the person appeared to be leisurely “wandering about”; looking at houses; fidgeting; and acting as though they were “on drugs or something”. Also, it so happens that there had been a number of burglaries in the neighborhood, and in this particular part of the neighborhood where he first saw this person.
His suspicions were based entirely on behavioral or circumstantial factors- not physical ones. He only mentioned Trayvon’s race and hoodie when asked to provide a physical description by the dispatcher. Ironically, while there is overwhelming evidence that the “suspect”‘s race and clothing were of great significance to others (coming to symbolize their cause), there is no evidence they were of particular significance to George Zimmerman. In fact, there is no evidence of racial “profiling” of any kind.
Finally, at no time during the call did he use a racial epithet of any kind. In short, there is absolutely no evidence that George Zimmerman is racist, or even prejudiced, against black people. In fact, there is overwhelming evidence that George Zimmerman is not a racist.
In short, this was a person he didn’t recognize, acting oddly, in an area with a recent spike in crime. The neighborhood watch captain, on his way to Target, acted appropriately in calling the non-emergency line and reporting it to the dispatcher.
No reckless chasing
This suspicious person, possibly noticing Zimmerman’s interest in him, approached Zimmerman’s vehicle to “check him out” (and/or to intimidate him as Zimmerman later suggested). Zimmerman, who did not wish to engage this person, remained in his vehicle. At this point, the suspicious person bounds off eastward and disappears around the corner, heading down the southern path of a “T” intersection. The suspicious person out of sight, and having apparently fled, Zimmerman exits his vehicle and heads east for the “T” section.
Shortly after Zimmerman left his vehicle, the dispatcher asked him “Are you following him?”, to which Zimmerman replied, “Yeah.” The dispatcher (possibly believing that Zimmerman was pursuing this person) told him “We don’t need you to do that.” Zimmerman said, “OK”- a term of agreement and compliance. In truth, Zimmerman had nothing to comply with, because Zimmerman had been “following” only in the sense that he was headed to a location the “suspect” had been (the “T”-intersection).
But his purpose in heading to that “T” was to look down the southern path to relay the heading of the “suspect” to the dispatcher. After looking south (and not seeing Trayvon), he went straight- continuing a little further east to an adjacent street. He went to the adjacent street in order to find a house number. (He had a house number for the street he was parked on (the one on the left/west side of the “T”), but he couldn’t think of the street name at the time. He did, however, know the name of the street to the right/east of the “T” (he lived on it), so if he had a house number he’d be able to relay his location to the police when they arrived.)
To recap: the ‘suspect’ headed south at the “T”, while Zimmerman headed east. If his intention had been to ‘chase’, ‘pursue’, or ‘follow after’ the suspect, then Zimmerman would have taken a right at the “T” and headed south after him. Zimmerman didn’t do that. He clearly did not intend to follow this person in any conventional sense of the word. He left his vehicle to relay requested information to the authorities. “Which way is this guy running?” “Where are you now?”
Trayvon initiated the encounter
On his way back to his vehicle (traveled west across the “T”-intersection), the ‘suspect’ appeared from the south path and, by all accounts, initiated verbal contact with Zimmerman. Zimmerman states that Trayvon asked Zimmerman if he had a problem. Zimmerman says ‘no’, Trayvon says ‘Well, ya do now’ and then Trayvon strikes Zimmerman, fracturing his nose.
It is less clear what exactly happened at this point but, in the midst of the assault, the two men moved south down the path. Zimmerman screams for help. His attacker tries to cover his mouth and nose at some point, hits Zimmerman’s head against the sidewalk, and when Zimmerman is convinced the guy is reaching for Zimmerman’s gun, Zimmerman draws it first, and shoots Trayvon a single time. Trayvon dies shortly thereafter.
That’s it. No racism. No chasing. No disobeying the dispatcher. We can’t account for every detail but the timeline of events, the location and extent of Zimmerman’s injuries, the locations of physical evidence, and the accounts of witnesses are all, by and large, consistent with his account. That is why he was not originally arrested and why he was not originally charged. The involvement of political activists and sensationalist reporting by the media finally contrived enough political pressure that George Zimmerman was inappropriately charged.
This is only meant as a ‘big picture’ introduction to the case. There is a lot more to this story. In the future, I will go into more detail and offer proof of my summary above. I will also go into many of the other aspects of this case in future posts.